Compare0

Method

Clear sources.
Visible limits.

A comparison is useful when you can see where the information came from and what it does not establish.

Smartphone with blank screen and unbranded navy, gold and violet membership cards
Online loyalty — editorial illustration

What a profile means

The VIP Index is an independent editorial comparison of public loyalty and VIP programme information. A profile records the product and market described by its sources. It is not an operator endorsement, a licence certificate or a report of personal account testing.

What we check

  1. The current programme name and official source.
  2. Ordinary enrolment versus invitation-only service or upper tiers.
  3. Published tier names and qualification information.
  4. Reward type, currency and redemption limitations.
  5. Expiry, restrictions, inconsistencies and source access.

There are 39 brand-and-programme profiles, not 39 unrelated parent operators. Several products connect to shared rewards networks. That relationship does not make their balances and conditions interchangeable.

How missing and conflicting terms are handled

We do not infer a cashback percentage, VIP entry deposit or host threshold from an industry norm. Missing information is marked as not publicly specified. When official pages conflict, the evidence note identifies the issue; no more generous interpretation is selected as a promise.

BitStarz is marked as limited source access because official indexed descriptions were available while live terms were region-restricted. Other profiles use public official pages, with scope notes identifying the materials reviewed. “Official-source profile” describes the provenance of the information, not a safety accreditation.

How the directory is ordered

The full directory defaults to alphabetical order. Homepage selections illustrate different structures. The number of tier labels recorded is an optional sort field; ranged tier names are not expanded. It is not a quality score. There are no fabricated player ratings, verified-payout badges or profitability rankings.

Our editorial VIP score

The separate VIP Index editorial ratings use a disclosed five-part, 100-point rubric for the clarity and detail of recorded programme information. They are this publication’s own scores, not player-review averages. Each component and the limits of the model are shown in the scoring method. Online contexts and resort programmes have separate lists.

Dates and changes

The public-source check date for this edition is 12 November 2026. It records the research snapshot. Personalised offers, logged-in account conditions and future changes may differ. The source directory keeps the official links available for rechecking.

Market and legal scope

International or offshore-facing is a context category. Inclusion is not a conclusion about legality in any visitor’s country. Market-specific online products, poker rewards and resort programmes remain labelled. Use the regulator’s current register where applicable and read the exact entity, domain and product terms.

Checking a possible correction

Open the profile’s official-source section and compare the current programme name, product and relevant clause. Keep a copy of the source URL and the date. A different account offer or jurisdiction may explain an apparent disagreement. This edition provides source links and a downloadable data snapshot; it does not operate a casino complaint or mediation service.

Read the source directory, commercial disclosure and offer checklist for the limits of the comparison.